$$$ KPO and CZM $$$: StashAway - March 2019

Friday, April 19, 2019

StashAway - March 2019

Yay! Long weekend! Happy Good Friday and Easter everyone! We will be going to the pokemon event in Sentosa tomorrow. Will you be there too? Hahaha.

Anyway, we have 3 portfolios now due to our new strategy - New Strategy: StashAway + Supplementary Retirement Scheme (SRS):
KPO and CZM Cash - StashAway Risk Index 20%
KPO SRS - StashAway Risk Index 13%
CZM SRS - StashAway Risk Index 13%

1. PORTFOLIO SUMMARY (as of the last day of the month)


Based on the statement (31 March 2019), KPO made $371.11 and CZM made $12.04.


As of 19 April 2019, the market has recovered quite significantly!
KPO: $995.48 (+12.0% - Capital: $17,750)
CZM: $21.02 (+4.4% - Capital: $750)

Note that these are reported in USD.

KPO and CZM Cash - StashAway Risk Index 20%

KPO SRS - StashAway Risk Index 13%

CZM SRS - StashAway Risk Index 13%
Our StashAway SRS accounts are showing a slight difference now due to fees being deducted from my account.


KPO and CZM Cash - StashAway Risk Index 20%:
SGD $451.73 converted to USD $333.11
Exchange Rate: 1.3561 (1.3605 last month)

KPO SRS - StashAway Risk Index 13%:
SGD $247.10 converted to USD $182.18
Exchange Rate: 1.3563 (1.3499 last month)

CZM SRS - StashAway Risk Index 13%:
SGD $247.40 converted to USD $182.40
Exchange Rate: 1.3563 (1.3499 last month)

As you can see, the "bug" has been fixed.


The fee stated is based on the monthly-average assets SGD $17,307.26 x 0.8% / 365 days * 31 days = $11.76 which is definitely incorrect. It should have been ($17,307.26 - $10,000) x 0.8% / 365 days * 28 days = $4.96. As mentioned previously, I was given a $10 credit because the referral promotion did not kick in last month.

No fee for CZM for the first 6 months.

StashAway VS STI ETF
Since there is no way to compare the performances among the robo-advisors, I came out with a spreadsheet to track our StashAway portfolio performance (General Investing - Risk Level 28) against that of STI ETF which I will be updating on a monthly basis. For simplicity, I shall assume that one can either invest in Nikko STI ETF using POSB Invest-Saver or invest in Nikko STI ETF/SPDR STI ETF using SCB Priority Online Trading (no minimum commission). These would be the opportunity costs while we continue to invest in StashAway.

Apart from the absolute P&L, we should also look at the Reward-to-Risk Ratio where risk/volatility is taken into account. For more information, do read StashAway Clarifications - Reward-to-Risk Ratio. StashAway has the highest ratio of 1.25 which is significantly higher than the other 2 STI ETFs (< 0.4). Let me quote Freddy Lim (Co-Founder & Chief Investment Officer of StashAway), "for every dollar of risk taken, StashAway P28 is producing 1.25 times the return".

This is updated till 19th April 2019 and is based on only 1 of our portfolio - KPO and CZM Cash - StashAway Risk Index 20%.

This month commentary: 
Yay, all the simulated investments are green now. Going forward it will be even more interesting when the commissions/fees incurred by StashAway exceed that of POSB Invest-Saver. This will be a battle between cheaper/lesser fees and asset allocation/diversification...


Looking at the time-weighted return, we can see that StashAway is "outperforming" the STI ETF (both excluding fees). In addition, it has lower volatility and max drawdown.

Which is the best? Only time will tell :)

This is the link to our spreadsheet - KPO & CZM StashAway Portfolio VS STI ETF which I have also added to Our Portfolio page.

StashAway Referral Link for Our Readers
Here you go: KPO and CZM Referral Link

You might be interested in previous months update too:
StashAway - December 2018
StashAway - January 2019 - $16,051.10
StashAway - February 2019 - $17,397.81
StashAway - March 2019 - $18,780.96

Do like any of the following for the latest update/post!
1. FB Page - KPO and CZM
2. Twitter - KPO and CZM
3. Click here to subscribe using email :)
4. Instagram - KPO_and_CZM (Did you see those delicious food photos to the right --> Unfortunately, you can't see it on mobile.)

1 comment: